FRAMES FOR INFINITIES
INFINITY.TXT describes 'frames'
FRAMES.TXT touch of poetry adds class
to math
This
is my my
masterpiece in
logic. Over 20 years in
the making. Quiet subliminal
congito in the background. An illumination,
a few years later another illumination. Suddenly one day
(January 30 1999) a final major illumination resolving all
other issues. Zeno's paradox is resolved forever, as far
as I am concerned, there is no paradox, and no
contention. Reading the file 'Frames.txt'
with the intent of understanding
(ergo read all of it,
then read it
again)
puts
to rest
the whole of
the conundrom involving
such paradoxes. You might not agree,
you might disagree, in which case I do not want
to hear about it unless you find some truly bonehead flaw
in my arguements, then, in which case, by all means,
email, since it would mean that the doors are
wide open again regards Zenos Paradox
Infinities do not exist, except in the hazy
minds of careless thinkers. All elements of Reality are enclosed
in 'frames' including numbers for ratios such as root 2 and
root 3 whose permutations seem to have infinitely long
never ending digits. And reciprocals of any number involving
the number 7 have a recurring 6 bit digit pak. But all such
do not occur outside of natural formations that contain them
in 'frames' in Reality. For instance root 2 is the direct
hypotenuse (in proportion) of a square. Root 3 is the definative
marker for all values of scale and proportion abounding in any
hexagram, or any formation with 30 or 60 degree angles. Root 5
is the marker for anything you might want to know about pentagrams,
from which arrises Golden Harmonic Ratios. In toto, all apparent
infinities are encased in something. Otherwise, the 'infinity'
is an invention that does not exist in Reality. As for digit
pak revolving permutations seen in reciprocals of number 7 values,
all reciprocals are unitless constructs of a fundamental principle
in geometry and so are 'frame' contained
anyway. The same is true for any number.
Click google logo for site search
INFINITY.TXT describes 'frames' |
This
is my my
masterpiece in
logic. Over 20 years in
the making. Quiet subliminal
congito in the background. An illumination,
a few years later another illumination. Suddenly one day
(January 30 1999) a final major illumination resolving all
other issues. Zeno's paradox is resolved forever, as far
as I am concerned, there is no paradox, and no
contention. Reading the file 'Frames.txt'
with the intent of understanding
(ergo read all of it,
then read it
again)
puts
to rest
the whole of
the conundrom involving
such paradoxes. You might not agree,
you might disagree, in which case I do not want
to hear about it unless you find some truly bonehead flaw
in my arguements, then, in which case, by all means,
email, since it would mean that the doors are
wide open again regards Zenos Paradox
Infinities do not exist, except in the hazy
minds of careless thinkers. All elements of Reality are enclosed
in 'frames' including numbers for ratios such as root 2 and
root 3 whose permutations seem to have infinitely long
never ending digits. And reciprocals of any number involving
the number 7 have a recurring 6 bit digit pak. But all such
do not occur outside of natural formations that contain them
in 'frames' in Reality. For instance root 2 is the direct
hypotenuse (in proportion) of a square. Root 3 is the definative
marker for all values of scale and proportion abounding in any
hexagram, or any formation with 30 or 60 degree angles. Root 5
is the marker for anything you might want to know about pentagrams,
from which arrises Golden Harmonic Ratios. In toto, all apparent
infinities are encased in something. Otherwise, the 'infinity'
is an invention that does not exist in Reality. As for digit
pak revolving permutations seen in reciprocals of number 7 values,
all reciprocals are unitless constructs of a fundamental principle
in geometry and so are 'frame' contained
anyway. The same is true for any number.
Click google logo for site search